Pretty-print doesn't work all that well, when it gets close up against the 80 column limit. At least, that's my experience reading its output.
Robby On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jos Koot <jos.k...@telefonica.net> wrote: > pretty-print (with (pretty-print-columns 80))? > jos > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org >> [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Jos Koot >> Sent: 02 August 2010 16:44 >> To: 'Robby Findler'; 'Horace Dynamite' >> Cc: users@racket-lang.org >> Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently >> >> WQhy would this be tricky? >> Jos >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org >> > [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Robby Findler >> > Sent: 02 August 2010 16:34 >> > To: Horace Dynamite >> > Cc: users@racket-lang.org >> > Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Horace Dynamite >> > <horace.dynam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > I >> > > do wonder how tricky it will be do have a line-breaking >> > routine that >> > > can take as input the program I posted, and produce as output the >> > > program you returned. >> > >> > That seems very tricky, at least to me. >> > >> > Robby >> > _________________________________________________ >> > For list-related administrative tasks: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
