At Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:04:11 +0000 (GMT), Ewan Higgs wrote: > Hi all, > I've been playing with the number tower in Racket and I noticed it appears to > drift from the R5RS and R6RS standard. Now, I know the Racket rebrand grants > PLT > > Scheme to now drift from the standard, but I think this may actually be > unintentional. So let me know if I've misunderstood this.
Racket intentionally extends the syntax of numbers. The Racket specification is here: http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/index.html and the syntax of numbers is specifically here: http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/reader.html#%28part._parse-number%29 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
