On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Will M. Farr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > >> Is this the same as the (brand-new) `for/flvector' and `in-flvector'? > > At the moment, these do not use the unsafe-... variants (though I can > eventually change them to do so). Is Typed-Scheme smart enough to change > them over even if I don't specify when somebody provides the correct flags?
Yes, it should be. -- sam th [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
