zo-parse is a work in progress. We're discovering as we go what the contracts should be. This is a case where the documentation must be wrong. We'll change it.
Jay On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Danny Yoo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm using Racket 5.0.1 and the compiler/zo-parse module. On some of > the structures I'm getting back, I'm seeing that a case-lam structure > has a clause that's an indirect, rather than a lam. The documentation > for 5.0.1 says that a clause has to be a lam though. Is this > intentional? > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > -- Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
