It would be a significant amount of work to remove regexps because there is a lot of code that uses them that would have to be rewritten. In the cases where a literal regexp is used, one could probably write a script to make it work, but cases where the function 'regexp' was used would probably all have to be inspected by hand. Also, there's all that code out there that others have written that we cannot get out hands on to rewrite.
Robby On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I can tell, pregexp functionality is a superset of regexp > functionality. Furthermore, the added functionality uses patterns > that are unlikely to occur by accident in normal regular expressions. > So is there any advantage to using regexp over pregexp? Why is there > a need for both to coexist in Racket? What would be the downside to > removing regexps from the language? > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
