*slaps forehead*
Thank you Eli & Jay. :^)
Horace.
On 11/11/2010 18:36, Jay McCarthy wrote:
In case it is not clear Horace, because it is inexact, there are
numbers after the decimal, representing nanoseconds, etc.
Jay
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay<e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
30 minutes ago, Horace Dynamite wrote:
The closest approximation I can find in the documentation is
current-milliseconds? I require more accuracy in my project,
specifically, nanosecond accuracy. I do apologise if I've missed
this information in the documentation, if so can anyone point me to
the right place? Or recommend a method to obtain more accuracy?
There's `current-inexact-milliseconds'.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
