[racket] ":" preferred to "define:"?

[Neil Van Dyke]

Why is ":" preferred to "define:", when usually you're just going to 
follow the ":" form with a "define" form?

The Typed Racket Reference says:
In most cases, use of ":" is preferred to use of "define:".

--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
 For list-related administrative tasks:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users