On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:29 AM, Casey Klein wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:27 AM, John Clements
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I would expect this program to signal an error:
>> 
>> #lang lazy
>> 
>> (define zeros (cons 0 zeros))
>> 
>> (define should-be-error (list-ref (take 15 zeros) 1324))
>> 
>> 
>> ... but instead should-be-error is bound to zero.  How can I take the 1000th 
>> element of a list with only 15 elements?  I'm tempted to make snide comments 
>> about laziness, but I'm sure it'll backfire when it turns out that somehow 
>> that's the right answer after all.
>> 
>> Bug report?
>> 
> 
> Sure enough:
> 
> http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=11458

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this appears to be a different issue.  The 
question here is not laziness, but the length of the resulting list.  Here's 
another example:

#lang lazy

(define zeros (cons 0 zeros))

(define lazy-list-of-length-one (take 1 zeros))

(define should-be-null (rest lazy-list-of-length-one))

=>

Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.0.99.6--2011-01-20(d675c7b/g) [3m].
Language: lazy [custom]; memory limit: 256 MB.
> (! should-be-null)
'(0 . #<promise:...llects/lazy/lazy.rkt:588:41>)
> 


Eli?


John

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to