On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:30 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
> ... the > bottom line is that the test of "non-#f" is very common -- so I really > don't want to force people to write some verbose > > (test (and E #t) => #t) > > or > > (test (not (not E)) => #t) > > or even > > (test (true? E) => #t) But this "verbose" solution is still not significantly longer than the nested "test" you propose. In any case, wouldn't (test E /=> #f) be even shorter and clearer? > Stephen Bloch sbl...@adelphi.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
