An hour ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:41:20 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> > Going back to the copyright issues -- is this a good time to get
> > rid of the two offending latex files?
>
> No. We have permission from CUP and SIGPLAN to distribute the style
> files, so we need to add something that indicates our license to
> distribute them.
IIUC, the problem is more than just allowing it to be distributed with
racket -- it's allowing derivative work too. (David will probably
know more about that.)
> (I expected the official copy of "sigplanconf.cls" to have a CC
> license by now, so I'll check into that.)
That should work fine.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
