Great advice! Okay, success in building v5.1.1 release with those two flags; but no luck with building latest git (@f60f234) *without* those flags. So, whatever fix you pushed hasn’t fixed all of the issues *yet*.
Here’s the stdout from building @f60f234: https://gist.github.com/962027 (FYI, I’m trying to get it also building under Homebrew, where it currently fails. That isn’t y’all’s problems, but here’s the GitHub issue anyway: http://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/issues/5408) On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > Following up on this hunch --- thanks to v8.googlecode.com for hints on > the problem --- I'm fairly certain that `--disable-places' and > `--disable-futures' would have been required. > > I've pushed a change that should solve that specific problem, so if > `--disable-places' and `--disable-futures' works with the v5.1.1 > release, then maybe the latest in git will work with plain `configure'. > Of course, there could be other problems. > >> At Fri, 6 May 2011 20:22:11 -0400, Elliott Cable wrote: >> > I can’t coerce the latest Racket source, from GitHub, to compile on >> > Lion. I wasn’t sure whether to build as 32-bit or 64-bit, so I tried >> > both. Here’s all of the relevant output, both the stdout from the >> > compilation process and the resultant crash report/core dump: >> > >> > HEAD (@70b0eb8) as 32-bit: https://gist.github.com/960017 >> > HEAD (@70b0eb8) as 64-bit: https://gist.github.com/960028 >> > v5.1.1 release as 32-bit: https://gist.github.com/960045 >> > v5.1.1 release as 64-bit: https://gist.github.com/960052 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users