On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Neil Van Dyke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps I should put it this way: if you're looking for interesting stuff in > programming language technology, I think you should be looking at "Racket" > instead of "Scheme" anyway. "Scheme" is old, and not where the interesting > evolution that descended from Scheme is happening.
I'd put this a bit differently: Racket will teach you all the things that Scheme would have (i.e., it would have the same contribution to your growth as a programmer), but also much more because of the many things it has that Scheme doesn't have. You could stop at the "end of Scheme", or you can keep going. Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
