Elliott Cable <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 1. You won't be able to put these in a single file and have it work. >> That's probably what's causing your problem. The R6RS doesn't specify >> how libraries and top-level programs map to the file system. In >> Racket, each R6RS library and each top-level program should be in a >> separate file. > > Really? Jesus, I thought modern tools like Racket were trying to move > us *away* from the mistakes that Java et al. made. Maybe I was > mistaken. > > On a more serious note: modular code, module systems in general, are > great. Thousands of files in a single project, many of which are less > than 100 lines of code, is *not* great. Multiple modules per file is > an absolute must, in my humble non-Schemer (yet.) opinion. (-: > > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Marco Maggi <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Elliott Cable wrote: >>> I'm new to both Racket and Scheme; I've been reading >>> through the R6RS, and I'm trying to get started with some >>> simple code. >> You can look at this simple pure R6 package which runs on >> most of the implementations, Racket included: >> >> <http://github.com/marcomaggi/infix> > > I greatly appreciate that, Marco. I’ll give that a thorough > exploration; that’s the exact sort of code I’m trying to write. > A few more links to R6RS code, if you decide you want to go down that route:
- https://gitorious.org/wak - https://github.com/rotty/spells - https://github.com/rotty/ocelotl - https://github.com/rotty/sbank - https://github.com/rotty/irclogs - https://github.com/rotty/conjure - http://home.gna.org/dorodango/ Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/> _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
