Vincent St-Amour wrote at 05/29/2011 09:07 AM:
macro-debugger/analysis/check-requires
or the script version: macro-debugger/analysis/check-requires-script
I used them in the past, and they work quite well.
That sounds promising. Thanks!
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote at 05/29/2011 09:02 AM:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote:
I assume that this comment means you know that Check Syntax isn't
accurate, right? Not every macro records disappeared uses correctly,
for example.
More problematically, uses of `require' can have side effects, which
Check Syntax of course doesn't know about.
In this case, I want to tidy up around 1,000 Racket source files with
which I'm somewhat familiar, and I expect that Check Syntax would be
able to do pretty much all of them fine.
--
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
