The `read/recursive' and `read-syntax/recursive' functions accept a readtable to use for the immediate read action, while nested reads use the `current-readtable' parameter. That's intended as a general chaining mechanism. Can you get the behavior you want by using those functions?
At Tue, 31 May 2011 14:29:29 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: > The make-readtable function allows me to remap individual characters > to new behaviors, and to remap the default behavior of unmapped > characters to new behavior. It also allows me to remap individual > characters to the behavior of another readtable (such as the default > readtable). I cannot, however, remap the default behavior of unmapped > characters to the behavior of another readtable. (The same > restriction appears to hold for "dispatch macro" mappings.) Is there > a way to do this that I have missed? If not, could this ability be > added? > > Carl Eastlund _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
