On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > But there you get the benefit of a compiler that can take advantage of > this, and we don't. (Even if it does, it would require even more > subtle points like avoiding struct definintions, threads, exceptions, > continuations...)
No that's yet another challenge. Can we 'specialize' our backend so that it can take advantaged of purity? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
