Greetings. On 2011 Jul 15, at 06:35, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> With the forthcoming Emacs mode for Racket, called Meow, I eagerly await it! > I intend to > provide a conventional typing interface and also some sexp-oriented > operations that people can adopt incrementally if they want. > ("meta-uparrow", to move up a sexp level, is one example of a sexp > operation people can adopt at any time, independent of other > operations.) I'd be interested in ideas how to better accommodate > people becoming power-users in small steps like this, rather than a > modal switch from dumb-editor keys to power-user keys. Where's your dumb-editor/power-user boundary? I take it that the C-M-u,d,f,b,k,q,a,e,h set of keystrokes are in the non-power-user category, yes? Given those, is there a strong need for an additional M-uparrow (etc) keystroke? Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users