I think the big difference, as someone who currently uses Check Syntax a lot, is that Peter is asking for refactoring that reaches to other files. Perhaps the right way to integrate this is via the module browser.
On Jul 16, 2011 10:06 AM, "Robby Findler" <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > I realize that Check Syntax requires some setup time, but speaking > purely in terms of functionality, is that getting at what you want? > > Robby > > 2011/7/16 Ivanyi Peter <piva...@freemail.hu>: > > Markku Rontu <markku.ro...@iki.fi>, ezt írta: > >> A wish list, well I'd like "extract function" refactoring and more advanced > >> renaming than search & replace. Also would be nice to be able to have > >> visibility to all defined modules, requires, provides, functions, classes, > >> structs etc. in a whole project and quick navigation within it. > > > > I also would like to vote for these. > > - E.g. Replacing a function name with any other name at > > every place where it can be "meaningfully" determined that > > it is the same function name. > > - Project view. Yes, please. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Peter Ivanyi > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
