On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > 15 minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: >> >> If do a "(require racket/set)", I really don't mind if the standard >> set symbols are also included as aliases in the module, so long as >> there are corresponding 7-bit ASCII names that I can use instead. > > On an even farther away tangent, I have recently wrote some code so I > can type `λ' etc conveniently in Emacs[*]. Even though I knew the > arguments on the subject, I was surprised at just how much more > convenient it makes things. I now see no reason to use `thunk' if I > can just (λ() ...), and in many cases things like `compose' or > `negate' become unnecessary. > > > ([*] I started with something close to what DrRacket does, then went > with something that I find even more convenient that hooks to the > Emacs input method thing but lets me use a huge set of names.)
Can you share the improvements/differences? Maybe DrRacket can get better on this score. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
