On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > * After a little thought, I've decided that I don't want random people's > comments or discussion in my Racket manuals. A simple HTML "a" element > feedback link on each page would be OK with me (but I'm not the person who > would have to spend time triaging the feedback thus submitted).
What if it is a collapsible panel; the kind where you only see the contents when you click on it to expand it? > * Not only do I not want "disqus.com" or similar service to be able to track > every documentation page I look at, but those services are almost always > hooked into multiple larger cross-site user tracking/profiling setups (e.g., > Facebook's, Google's, various ad networks). What if a trust-able site hosted it? > (If one is from Denmark, which > I understand is an extremely nice place, one might have trouble believing > the moral flexibilities of Internet companies elsewhere.) So, if local > documentation page views or searches call out to the Internet, either there > should be an easy and reliable way to opt out of this (not an opt-out > browser cookie), or I will have to write a PLaneT package that constantly > decontaminates a user's local documentation, and that has a marginally > offensive name. What if when local content was generated; it became a link to the external discussion thread? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
