> I don't see a way that is fundamentally better than what you're doing > there, but one minor tweak is that you could turn the images into > something like this > > (make-an-image #"...image's bytes go here") > > instead of a url, where make-an-image builds the image from the bytes. > But maybe you have some reason why urls work better, I'm not sure.
Yes, essentially that's what I'm doing. I'm using the data: url scheme to let me encode the image bytes directly within the image uri. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
