Sam and Anthony, hello. On 2011 Aug 17, at 16:32, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> No, that's not right. The objects in the category described in the > wikipedia article are *types*, not functions. I think I expressed myself badly. I think I'm less muddled than I may sound, but we're off-topic, and I'm probably exhausting your patience for stump type-theory tutorials! Thanks for the 'apply' fix. Thanks also, Anthony, for the functors page. I haven't made a lot of sense of it, but it may just be the excuse I've been waiting for to let myself learn Haskell. Best wishes, all, Norman -- Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
