On Aug 21, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > Ray Racine wrote at 08/21/2011 01:06 PM: >> So here is the scenario. Joe the some what experienced coder hears lisp is >> cool and Racket is the coolest lisp around. > > I understand what you're saying, and I think you've convinced me to change my > answers. Before, I wanted Joe to use PLaneT development links early and > often, to smooth the transition to sharing code, but they are a little > annoying even when you know how to use them and you have scripts to help > automate. > > What if we initially tell Joe to just using relative filenames in his > "require"s for his own multi-file project for now?
For what it's worth, this is also what I would suggest. Relative requires work great, and still allow you to use subdirectories to organize code. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
