Whoops, sorry: I meant 'in-string' (and then just print the result). Robby
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Chang <stch...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> You can also use for/string to make a pretty compact version. > > I was trying to find something like that but it doesnt seem to exist? > I had to use string-map from srfi/13 > > http://docs.racket-lang.org/search/index.html?q=for/string > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users