On Aug 28, 2011, at 1:02 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I don't see what's wrong with using `dynamic-wind' directly: > > (dynamic-wind setup > (λ () (test ...)) > teardown) > It has a huge advantage of already being there, separate from the the > testing facility, and I didn't see any use that needs something > special.
The Java people argue so too and force people to use the command pattern for all exn-triggering tests. Isn't the sheer presence of a macro system an indication that Racketeers don't want this kind of syntactic repetition? See the future-lambda email thread for the same idea. -- Matthias _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
