> Is there a reason not to just use `syntax-case' (or even better,
> `syntax-parse')?
Sheer ignorance, my dear chap. I didn't realize that that worked!
(A docs hint may be in order....)
For those reading this later, here's an example:
(define-syntax (String$ stx)
(syntax-case stx (String$)
[String$
(with-syntax ([term stx])
#'(first-order-sig string? #'term))]))
but also note the discussion on the thread "syntax-parse and literals"
on why syntax-parse is better than syntax-case (and it's not just
because of the parsing).
Shriram
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
