Right, but what I want to do in this case is pass in 'x' and dynamically construct posn-x rather than pass in the accessor 'posn-x' itself. In other words, I know I want to call a posn accessor, but I don't know which one yet.
I want to dynamically build and call the method rather than just dynamically call the method. On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]>wrote: > > In Racket, accessors are functions and are thus perfectly legitimate > arguments: > > (define (foo some-posn some-accessor) > (some-accessor some-posn)) > > > (foo my-posn posn-x) > 3 > > > > > > >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
