I gave this a try but quickly realized that there is no good place for the button (this is more a UI issue than a "what can gracket2 do issue I think). So I'll try the "don't automatically Go away" mode to avoid bouncing.
Robby On Friday, September 9, 2011, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm definitely in favor of the alpha fanciness idea. The others seem reasonable as well, though. > > sam th > > On Sep 9, 2011 8:09 PM, "Robby Findler" <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Robby Findler >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Speaking of things that would improve the experience of those who keep >>>>> parens balanced, if the error message appearing didn't move the >>>>> division between the definitions and interactions window, that would >>>>> be really nice. >>>> >>>> That bounce must be really annoying, I can see that. >>>> >>>> I've been thinking about what would be a good fix, but am having >>>> trouble, given the constraint that I want the error message to be >>>> visible without having to mouse over something. >>>> >>>> How about this: I'll make it so the error message thing doesn't go >>>> away automatically, but instead the text just gets erased. There'll be >>>> a separate little close button (like there is for the search thingy) >>>> that you have to close. Then the text can come and go without bouncing >>>> and for programs that don't have errors (like if you're browsing a >>>> bunch of files) you don't lose that extra line at the bottom. Sound >>>> worth trying? >>> >>> I'd be fine with that. I'd also be fine with keep the bar there all >>> the time. But it seems like the optimal solution would be for the bar >>> to appear and disappear, but not change the divider location. Is that >>> possible with `racket/gui'? That would make it more reasonable to >>> show more of the error when it's more than 1 line, as well. >> >> Well, we can make the bar be a part of the interactions window (or the >> bottommost definitions window if there is no interactions window) by >> drawing on top of the text with some alpha fanciness, or we can have >> it be a control in the window. If it is a control in the window, some >> other window has to get smaller, or the whole window has to get bigger >> (the latter is generally considered a bad idea I think). >> >> So, those are the options. >> >> Now that I write that, I'm thinking that maybe doing alpha fanciness >> on the bottom-most definitions window might be worth trying...? >> >> Robby >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
