On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:31 PM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > My impression is that ocaml is much more actively developed & maintained that > SML. > Furthermore, having used both (2-3K in each?), I believe that the only > differences you'll > encounter early will be ocaml's single semicolon rather than SML's double (or > is it the > other way?), and SML's top-level pattern-matching.
>From what I read they seem pretty similar; I was more concerned with the pedagogy of the book, I haven't quite found something for OCaml that gets anywhere close to the stuff I see pop up on the list. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
