On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:05:23 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: >On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, John Clements ><[email protected]> wrote: >>?In my world, a change will fall into the "yes, racket is a rapidly changing language" bin; >> it's not unusual for much of my old code to be broken. > >I realize this is a meta question, but is this the world we really >want Racket to be in? > >Robby
It's a world I don't mind Racket being in. Broken code is usually just finding where the old library is hidden, and at least the syntax never changes... I can read and understand the new stuff. Pat
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
