On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> Also if there are any articles that discuss the design decisions about >> Racket where it has diverged from the usual or standard form of Scheme. >> Not just where it differs but why it was made different. > > Off the top of my head, I can't think of any good articles that broadly > and explicitly compare Racket and Scheme. However, several articles have > addressed "why Racket" such as these:
In a Reddit comment, I listed a *lot* of features that Racket has that are missing in various Scheme standards: http://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/k8jiw/what_are_the_main_differences_between_racket_and/c2icbcg Some of the other commenters in that thread point out a few big things I missed, like Scribble. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
