An hour and a half ago, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > On 06/10/11 19:21, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > Dealing with exif information is something completely different > > from what a gui system is supposed to do. > > I understand that. However, my use of this image for thumbnailing is > on a project which does image manipulation on the command line so it > would be interesting if, when creating the thumbnail, the exif would > be kept, and then I would just update the size using ffi to exif > lib. On the other hand, once the exif lib bindings are finished I > can copy them to the thumb anyway. > > > It's probably best to use something like imagemagick if you need > > that. (There's an old glue in the ffi examples directory, maybe > > someone will update it?) > > Yes, using the bindings to imagemagick sounds like a neat idea.
If you need some command-line tool, then a possibly quicker alternative to the ffi is to just construct command-line uses of imagemagick. It has a very sophisticated syntax for such things that makes it possible to do sophisticated scripting jobs. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users