In full Racket, use rackunit and it has all these goodies. For *SL, I prefer it if students spell it all out. It is trivial to indoctrinate every single student with a test is only a test if it consists of an expression and an expected value.
On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:43 PM, Adam Shaw wrote: > Forgive me if the following already exists in Racket, but I would appreciate > if something like > > (check-fact <bool-exp>) > > (or check-pred, check-truth, whatever) as an alternative to > > (check-expect <bool-exp> true) > > Seems like it would be a reasonable addition. > > Cheers - Adam > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
