Yes, that change was part of v5.1.2. An exact nonnegative integer N can be used as a sequence equivalent to `(in-range N)', so that
(for ([i 10]) ...) iterates `i' from 0 to 9. At Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:20:37 -0700, Jay McCarthy wrote: > It is intentional. It broke mongodb too, but I forget what the > justification was. I think Matthew made the chance... but I forget > when. > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:35 PM, J G Cho <g...@fundingmatters.com> wrote: > > Congrats to the new release. > > > > Some of my tests were failing under 5.2 > > > > Upon some poking around, I find (sequence? 2) now return #t is the > > culprit. Is this change intentional? If so, why? > > > > Regards, > > > > jgc > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > > > > > > -- > Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> > Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University > http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay > > "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
