Why don't you evaluate the require in the REPL directly? (The error could be in a require line, so there is no way of saying 'load this even if hell breaks loose').
On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Todd O'Bryan wrote: > One thing that annoys me about DrRacket is that, if you have an error > in the Definitions pane, none of your required modules are loaded, so > if you try to fiddle in the Interactions window, you get "undefined" > errors. It may be that (require ...) can appear pretty much anywhere, > so I don't know if it's reasonable to try to read in the require specs > from the top of the Definitions file, but some way to say, "Here are > the things I need in the Interactions, even if my Definitions fail" > would be nice. > > Todd > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
