>From Racket v5.2 release notes:
> Internal-definition expansion has changed to use let* semantics for
> sequences that contain no back references. This change removes a
> performance penalty for using internal definitions instead of let in
> common cases, and it only changes the meaning of programs that capture
> continuations in internal definitions. Internal definitions are now
> considered preferable in style to let.
I'm not sure that I understand, but if I have it figured out then this:
(define (foo x)
(local [(define i 10)
(define j 12)]
(+ x i j)))
Is now considered better style then this?
(define (foo2 x)
(let ([i 10]
[j 12])
(+ x i j)))
Why?
Shalom,
Jordan
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
