On 2011-11-16 13:56:31 +0800, José Lopes wrote: > However, what I really wanted was to preserve the name of the local > variable (e.g., brick) and find some other way to refer to the > structure (e.g., struct:brick).
Sorry for misunderstanding your original e-mail. Since struct communicates with match using a transformer binding (different from the struct type), you can make your own syntax binding for it like so: (define-syntax brick-info (syntax-local-value #'brick)) and use "brick-info" (which is now bound to the struct-info for brick). Cheers, Asumu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
