I think your solution is perfectly sensible.

shift/reset needs two CPS transformations. Then you have two
continuations : one local (up to the next reset), one global
(from the next reset to the toplevel). The global one is usually
called the meta-continuation, and often denoted m.

I think this is explained in "Abstracting Control" by Filinski and Danvy.

This blog post shows an evaluator for shift/reset where you can see
the two continuations at work:

http://calculist.blogspot.com/2006/11/shift-and-reset-via-two-continuations.html


Best regards,

Nicolas.
_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Reply via email to