Hi R. Noob, > Do the URLs of pages that use continuation > mechanism have to look ugly and cryptic?
Yes they do. The URLs are ugly *because* they are cryptic. They are cryptic because it is a route to system security. If they were pretty, people could guess them, and that would adversely affect security in a huge way. Incidentally, this is something we stressed from the very beginning (~late 2000). It meant that certain kinds of Web attacks over which people and Web sites spent a great deal of time (such as CSRF attacks) could simply never occur for systems built atop the PLT Web server. This idea is also incorporated into Google's Belay project: https://sites.google.com/site/belayresearchproject/ If you look at the list of features they state, essentially every single one of these maps onto "ugly and cryptic" URLs. Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
