On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:00 AM, John Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > > Examining the difference between Inexact-Real and Float yields this: > >> (:type Float) > (U Float-Positive-Zero Float-Negative-Zero Float-Nan Positive-Float > Negative-Float) >> (:type Inexact-Real) > (U Float-Positive-Zero Float-Negative-Zero Float-Nan Positive-Float > Negative-Float Single-Flonum-Positive-Zero Single-Flonum-Negative-Zero > Single-Flonum-Nan Positive-Single-Flonum Negative-Single-Flonum) > > ...which actually made me laugh out loud. Is there a predicate I can use > instead of 'inexact-real?' that checks whether a number belongs to the type > Float?
You can use `flonum?' as the predicate for `Float', which excludes single-precision floats. But why do you want to exclude them? -- sam th [email protected] ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
