On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > I'm not sure of the precise answer, but I don't think that all floats > (even the integers) have a corresponding fixnum.
My C brain wonders why I can't just cast it to get the lower bits, I don't care about overflow. Using fixnum? does indeed work, just far too slowly. Still, good to know. I didn't think of using Typed Racket like that. I should mention that this is the best method I've found so far: (: float->int (Float -> Integer)) (define (float->int x) (floor (inexact->exact (floor x)))) ; both floors are necessary ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
