Does anyone use MzCOM, which makes Racket available as a COM object? I would like to rename "MzCOM" to "RacketCOM", change its language from `scheme' to `racket' (which mostly affects the way that results are printed), and and change the ProgID, CLSID, and display name (which MysterX treated as the "coclass" name).
We could keep MzCOM for compatibility if there is demand, but my guess is that it will be ok to just drop MzCOM. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
