On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:36 PM, Helmut Rohrbacher wrote: > Danny & Matthias, > > I hadn't known about structure properties. I think lumping enough syntactic > sugar onto your syntax definitions, Matthais, might make it feasible to > reproduce something to provide the functionality I'm looking for. > > The only thing is, how do you extend these properties to built-in types like > LIST and VECTOR? I'm guessing that you'd need to wrap them in a user-defined > type...
I imagine that one could use impersonators for vectors and _mutable_ lists. -- Matthias ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
