On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Robby Findler
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure of the answer, but you might have better results if you
> work directly with the primitives that the profiler is using, namely
> calling continuation-marks directly at some point where things are
> funny and seeing what you get from contination-mark-set->context on
> those marks in different contexts.
Yes. I do see different marks in the two contexts. Here, let me make
it easier for someone to investigate this. You can check out:
https://github.com/dyoo/profiler-tutorial
and run:
$ racket run-profiler.rkt runner.rkt
vs:
$ racket --no-jit run-profiler.rkt runner.rkt
to see the effect of running the profiler with and without the JIT.
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
