John,
Thank you.
I've replaced the requirement with clements/sxml2 and am happy to say
that it works like a charm.
Had to add the sxml:document convenience function and that was it.
Thanks again!
Joop
On 03/26/2012 01:29 AM, John Clements wrote:
On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Joop Ringelberg wrote:
Hello all,
I try to write a small module language (named: biglooModuleSyntax.scm) in order
to be able to run some files with a bigloo module statement in Racket. However,
I run into a problem I do not understand at all.
The (Bigloo) code loads a library ssax-sxml. In Racket, this must be replaced by: (require (planet
"sxml.ss" ("lizorkin" "sxml.plt" 2 1))). The Bigloo code also needs some extra
functions not provided by sxml.ss, so I require an additional small module (in missing-ssax-functions.scm).
To this end, biglooModuleSyntax.scm contains the following macro:
This is entirely orthogonal to your question, but I would encourage you to use
(require (planet clements/sxml2))
rather than the outdated sxml PLaneT package. The differences, in a nutshell:
- MUCH faster install times thanks to simpler dependencies,
- a bit of error-handling cleanup,
- some documentation,
... and possibly other stuff that I've forgotten about.
All the best,
John Clements
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
