Just now, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > #lang racket
> > ...
> > (module+ test (require rackunit))
> > ...
> > (module+ test ...test code here...)
> > ...
>
> I have added this sketch to the Style guide, replacing my own manual
> method with this new notion:
>
>
> http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/Style/style/Units_of_Code.html#(part._.Sections_and_.Sub-modules)
>
> Note that this won't work in 5.2.1 yet. -- Matthias
BTW, it might have made sense for a testing framework to add some
macro to do that -- but the forms are close enough so it's not needed,
which is why I like the `module+' thing so much...
(BTW², the only very minor problem is "module" -- imagine telling
students about this: they don't need to know what a "module" is. But
that's not a big problem, since even without knowing about modules in
the racket sense, they can understand it in the "subsection" sense...)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
