A few minutes ago, Laurent wrote:
>
> So maybe a compromise would be to use parameters for most (anaphoric) cases,
> but still allow to specify a lexically scoped ("hygienic") binding for
> particular cases, e.g.:
> (while #:abort top-while-abort #:it top-while-it
> (while
> ....use the usual `abort' for the inner loop or the `top-while-abort' to
> escape the top while....)
> ....)
>
> ?
That makes it redundant, since if you have just the syntax parameters,
you can replace this (for example):
(while #:abort my-abort (condition)
(code))
with
(while (condition)
(define my-abort abort)
(code))
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
