Ok I see from the syntax/parse source that it uses lctx as the first argument to datum->syntax, so that mostly answers my question.
On 05/17/2012 02:41 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote: > What exactly are the semantics of #:at inside a #:literal-sets ([x #:at y]) ? > > From the docs " If the #:at keyword is given, the lexical context of the lctx > term is used to determine which identifiers in the patterns are treated as > literals;". In what way is 'lctx' used? > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
