I think there probably should not be a standard shortcut. You may well have a good reason for to import a module into multiple phases, but I think it usually indicates a code-organization problem (where code that needs to live at different phases has been lumped together at some level). Since it's usually a bad idea, I'd rather not encourage it with a shortcut.
At Mon, 21 May 2012 14:55:08 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > I'm wondering whether there's a standard shortcut, and, if not, whether > there should be. > > (I am pretty deep into macrology right now, hence the question. :) > > Jon Rafkind wrote at 05/21/2012 02:28 PM: > > (define-syntax-rule (require-for-all req ...) (require (for-meta -1 req > > ...) > (for-meta 0 req ...) (for-meta 1 req ...)) > > (require-for-all "a.rkt" "b.rkt" "c.rkt") > > > > should work afaik > > > > On 05/21/2012 11:39 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > > >> If I want to "require" a module for multiple phases, is there a shortcut > >> for > that? > [...] > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
