Does this deserve an entry in our Wiki on code nuggets whose name escapes me once again? -- Matthias
On May 31, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > I would use "sync/timeout" or "sync/timeout/enable-break", like Sam said. I > don't recall using "read-bytes-evt", but I am fond of "read-bytes-avail!" in > conjunction with "sync/timeout"*. Would be interesting to see how > efficiently one could handle a particular I/O profile using > "read-bytes-avail!", "read-bytes!-evt", and "read-bytes-evt". > > Neil V. > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
